The teaching of the Buddha is often associated with enlightenment and liberation from suffering. Yet an important question remains: does awakening lead the soul to withdraw from the world, or does true wisdom call a person to remain among people — helping others awaken and move toward truth, compassion, and unity?
Definition. Buddhism is a spiritual tradition associated with the teaching of Siddhartha Gautama, known as the Buddha (563–483 BC). His teaching addresses fundamental questions about suffering, enlightenment, rebirth, and the discipline of the mind. This chapter reflects on sayings and parables attributed to the Buddha and examines how spiritual insight can later be transformed into religious systems.
This reflection continues a series of commentaries examining sacred teachings, spiritual symbols, and religious traditions through reason, conscience, and moral responsibility — including reflections on passages from the Tanakh, the Bible, and the Quran, which together form the scriptural foundations of several major world traditions.
Contents: Enlightenment or Escape? Rethinking the Teaching of the Buddha
Questions for Reflection
- Who Was the Buddha and How Is Enlightenment Understood?
- Why Did the Buddha Turn from Asceticism to the Golden Mean?
- Is Nirvana Liberation from Suffering or Withdrawal from the World?
- What Did the Buddha Teach About Death and Rebirth?
- How Was the Buddha’s Teaching Reworked into Religious Language?
- How Do Buddhism and Hinduism Reflect the Question of Divine Reality?
- What Wisdom Is Preserved in Sayings Attributed to the Buddha?
- What Does the Parable of the Elephant Teach About Compassion and Sacrifice?
- What Role Should Conscience Play in Spiritual Teaching and Public Life?
Core Themes of This Chapter
• The meaning of enlightenment in the teaching of the Buddha
• The Middle Path and the discipline of reason
• Nirvana and the question of withdrawal from the world
• Compassion, responsibility, and spiritual maturity
• How teachings can later become religious systems
Buddha and the Search for Sacred Answers

Siddhartha Gautama of the Gautama family is presented here not merely as the founder of a religion, but as a messenger who reached a high degree of spiritual awakening. In this sense, anyone who attains a certain level of enlightenment may be called a Buddha.
When the soul rises to a level where sacred answers become accessible, those answers may become the foundation of a true teaching. Such a teaching is from above, yet the answers must still be reached through personal spiritual labor, inner vision, and disciplined reflection. In that process, the Almighty guides the one entrusted with a mission.
Let us therefore consider several steps by which the Buddha moved toward such answers, according to texts written and preserved after his passing.
Asceticism, Reason, and the Golden Mean
At a mature age, the Buddha chose the life of an ascetic. Some time later, he ceased to live by strict asceticism alone and began to follow the principle of the golden mean.
Yet he did not reject asceticism. He used it.
By living as an ascetic, he minimized contact with worldly routine, clearing time from noise and distraction so that the mind could observe, reflect, and grow in clarity. This is an important distinction: reason does not arise from wisdom; rather, wisdom grows out of reason when reason is joined with life experience and knowledge. In this way, the Buddha advanced toward wisdom.
This understanding also gives asceticism a proper place. It is not a goal in itself, nor a sign of holiness merely because it is severe. It is a tool that may free the mind from constant agitation and make room for deeper perception.
Nirvana, Samsara, and the Purpose of Enlightenment
When the Buddha reached enlightenment, he is said to have faced the possibility of withdrawing into Nirvana — understood here as an emotionless emptiness. But his answer showed that enlightenment had not been attained in order to hide from suffering, anxiety, and reflection within the cycle of Samsara.
Rather, enlightenment was attained in order to help the world find the path of truth and to bring the teaching to others.
In Buddhism, Nirvana is often understood as liberation from Samsara, the cycle of rebirth. In Hinduism, release from Samsara is often presented as a transition from the darkness of the temporary into the world of true reality and immortality.
This raises a difficult question:
Is spiritual liberation fulfilled by withdrawing from the suffering of the world, or by returning to the world with greater compassion, insight, and responsibility?
If Nirvana is understood merely as a refuge from suffering, then the soul may remain fixed at one stage of its development. In that case, the soul avoids the very struggle through which darkness and light are understood. To flee from the lessons hidden within the wheel of Samsara is also to flee from the chance to grow.
Death, Rebirth, and the Meaning of the Buddha’s Mission
Although the Buddha did not always answer his disciples directly about what awaited him after earthly death, the answer is seen here in sayings attributed to him over the course of his life.
“My disciples, my final moment has come, but do not forget that death is only the end of the physical body…”
“My life is now finished. The sufferings and desires of this world have been uprooted. And I know that I shall not return to this world again.”
These sayings present death not as annihilation, but as the end of bodily existence. They also suggest that the purpose of spiritual life is not endless repetition, but purification, completion, and release from lower forms of desire.
The Bodhisattva Vows and Later Religious Language
It is said that the Buddha called himself a Bodhisattva and bound himself to a series of vows.
“Although I have become a Buddha, I will not leave this world until every living being has reached the state of a Buddha and attained enlightenment.”
In such words, the Buddha is presented not as one who seeks escape, but as one whose enlightenment remains tied to the spiritual progress of others. This suggests a level of responsibility extending beyond individual liberation.
Another vow states:
“Although I have become a Buddha, my state will not be complete until the light of my teaching reaches every corner of the universe.”
Here the underlying meaning appears to be the spreading of teaching throughout the world. The references to the “universe” may reflect later translation or expansion.
Other formulations become more problematic:
“Although I have become a Buddha, my state will not be complete until all Buddhas in the ten directions unite to honor my name.”
At this point, a shift becomes visible. The language begins to resemble not the speech of a teacher pointing beyond himself, but the work of later religious craftsmen transforming a teaching into an object of religious veneration..
The same concern grows stronger in later vows:
“Although I have become a Buddha, my state will not be complete until people sincerely aspire to be reborn in my land by repeating my name ten times…”
“…until they sincerely wish to be reborn in my dominion…”
“…and I will welcome them into my Pure Land.”
These phrases raise serious questions. When a teaching begins to speak in terms of “my land,” “my Pure Land,” and salvation through repeated invocation of a name, one may ask whether the original teacher is still speaking — or whether later religious institutions have begun to remake the teaching in their own image.
For that reason, such formulas can be read here not as authentic spiritual speech, but as signs of religious reconstruction.
Some of the later vows preserve noble language:
“Although I have become a Buddha, this state will not be complete until people all over the world, upon hearing my name, come to understand life and death rightly and attain that perfect wisdom which preserves the mind in purity and serenity amid a world of greed and suffering.”
These are good and true words. Yet they can be wrapped around a false center — one that gradually forms the image of a deity within religion.
Buddhism, Hinduism, and the Question of the Divine
Buddhism and Hinduism are related in many of their spiritual intuitions. Yet they also appear divided by differences so sharp that one may ask whether these divisions always arise from genuine spiritual necessity.
The disputes often seem less like a search for truth and more like the work of religious gatekeepers dividing one teaching into separate systems, and therefore dividing peoples themselves.
Hinduism speaks of three divine figures: Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva. But spiritual vision may ask whether the functions of creation, preservation, and destruction truly require separate gods.
If Brahma is the Creator of the universe, then who except the Creator could possess the power to preserve the world, destroy it, and build it anew? In that case, plurality begins to point back toward unity.
That question leads toward monotheism, and such unity does not fit easily into systems that preserve division. The same concern appears in Buddhist contexts, where even the highest gods are not always understood as eternal in the fullest sense.
Most people, however, accept whatever their “own” religion tells them. They do not examine it deeply. But some do ask a more difficult question:
If not in God, then in what should one ultimately believe?
In response, religious systems often multiply formulas, categories, and sacred institutions. In Buddhist teaching this appears in the framework of the “three jewels”: Buddha, Dharma, and Sangha. Yet for many people, the deeper question remains unresolved:
Who created the universe, the planetary system, and all living things?
From that unresolved question, new answers multiply, and each answer may grow into its own confession, doctrine, and institution. Thus even within Buddhism and related traditions, millions become separated.
Sayings Attributed to the Buddha
Sayings on Balance, Discipline, and Compassion
There are a series of teachings and parables attributed to the Buddha’s earliest disciples, many of which are valued very highly.
“Those who choose the path to enlightenment should carefully avoid two extremes. The first is indulgence in bodily desires. The second is the opposite extreme of ascetic practice — the unreasonable tormenting of one’s body and mind.”
“The key to following the path to enlightenment is not to be caught and confused by any extreme, but always to follow the middle way.”
“If one seeks not to become trapped by inclinations, one must first learn not to be attached to anything.”
“The wise person recognizes truth impartially in accordance with the changing circumstances of life, and does not rejoice in success or despair in failure.”
The teaching should not be interpreted as emotional emptiness. No human being can simply cease to rejoice or grieve. The true point is moderation.
In everything one should try to keep emotion within the framework of the golden mean. A moderate joy attracts positive energy. A moderate sadness costs only a small measure of energy. But if joy turns into euphoria, inner strength is depleted. If sadness becomes self-torment, life energy is lost even more seriously.
The point is not the destruction of feeling, but its right measure.
Order, Sin, and the Distinction Between Good and Evil
Other sayings preserved in the tradition speak about moral order.
“There is a certain order in nature, and everything has its purpose. Violation of this order inevitably leads to destruction.”
“The unrighteous do not recognize sinful actions as sins. If you tell them of their unrighteousness, they do not stop sinning and do not like being told of their offenses.”
“The wise are sensitive to the distinction between good and evil.”
These teachings are valued here because they affirm that moral disorder is not neutral. Disorder destroys. Evil does not heal itself merely by being ignored. And a mind that cannot distinguish good from evil is not yet wise.
The Parable of the Elephant
One of the wonderful parables is the story of the elephant and the hunter.
A hunter, knowing that an elephant was preparing to attain the state of Buddha, disguised himself as a Buddhist monk, approached the elephant by deception, and struck it with a poisoned arrow. Realizing that death was near, and seeing that the hunter was a prisoner of worldly passions, the elephant took pity on him. Rather than retaliate, it protected the hunter from the vengeance of the other elephants. When the hunter confessed that he had sought the elephant’s six tusks for reward, the elephant broke off his tusks and gave them to him, saying: “With this offering I complete my training on the path to enlightenment, and in my next life I will be reborn in the Pure Land. When I become a Buddha, I will help you free yourself from the three poisoned arrows: greed, anger, and ignorance.”
The parable expresses several truths at once: compassion toward the guilty, sacrifice without calculation, and the refusal to answer evil with revenge.
From here follow a number of related teachings:
“Those who seek enlightenment must keep the mind unclouded.”
“Concentration of consciousness leads to wisdom, and wisdom is the guarantee of enlightenment.”
“The Noble Eightfold Path includes right vision, right intention, right speech, right conduct, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, and right concentration.”
“True offering is performed spontaneously, from a pure compassionate heart, without thought of reward for a righteous act.”
“If there is room for repentance in the soul, sins disappear. If there is no repentance, corruption continues and punishment becomes inevitable.”
This is a major point: hearing truth is not enough. Truth must be lived.
Practical Sayings on Faith, Mind, Family, and Society
The sayings continue:
“Faith is support on the long and exhausting path that leads to enlightenment. A believing mind is a sincere mind, a deep mind, a mind capable of sincere joy.”
“Anger will not disappear while aggressive thoughts continue to disturb the mind. Anger disappears when resentment is forgotten.”
“Idleness shortens life, while diligence prolongs it; fools are lazy, but wise people labor.”
“The mind belongs to its owner, not to the enemy who tempts the person toward evil deeds.”
“This world is like a bubble, like a web with a spider, like a vessel full of impurities; one should constantly keep the mind unclouded.”
“A person cannot hope to purify either body or mind while ignorance remains firmly seated in consciousness.”
And then the teaching becomes practical and social:
“To honor one’s parents more fully, one must learn kindness toward all living beings.”
“To live happily with one’s wife and children, one should avoid lust and selfish thoughts centered on personal comfort.”
“A mind filled with compassion toward the poor becomes a mother to all people, honors all people, sees them as friends, and respects them as parents.”
“The relationship between husband and wife exists not only for pleasure. It has a deeper meaning than simply living together in one house. Husband and wife should use the closeness of their union to help one another perfect the mind on the path to enlightenment.”
These sayings are especially valuable because they connect spiritual teaching with daily life, family, social conduct, and compassion.
Conscience, Spiritual Responsibility, and the Fate of Nations
“The kingdom of the devil is full of greed, darkness, poverty, rivalry, wars and bloodshed; it also abounds in jealousy, prejudice, hatred, deception, flattery, intrigue, and rudeness.”
“In a country where true teaching prevails, every inhabitant has a pure and peaceful mind.”
Such sayings turn us to a broader moral challenge.
In every country there are thousands of priests, religious leaders, and teachers. If they truly wished to do so, they could unite their people against corruption, crime, poisoned food, destructive technologies placed among ordinary homes, and the many forms of degradation that harm society. If they were truly warriors of the Most High, and truly rooted in faith, they would willingly perform spiritual deeds to protect their people.
If thousands of such leaders stood against a small number of servants of corrupt power, the balance should not be difficult. If they are lions, what prevents them from overcoming a hundred jackals of corruption and decay? If they are true, how have the fallen succeeded in dividing them into religions, dividing nations, and setting peoples against one another in war, plunder, and hatred?
Draw your own conclusion with your own reason, listening to the voice of God — conscience.
The point of these uncomfortable words and questions is not hatred toward priests, polytheists, manipulated soldiers, thieves, or tyrants. The aim is that the help of the Almighty, through the gift already given, may still help such people hear the voice of conscience and cease to serve what is false.
Conclusion
The teachings attributed to the Buddha preserve many profound insights about balance, compassion, repentance, discipline, family life, and the purification of the mind. At the same time, later religious language can alter the tone and direction of a teaching, gradually transforming a guide into an object of cultic devotion.
For this reason, spiritual traditions must be read not only with reverence, but also with conscience.
The central question is not whether a tradition calls itself sacred, but whether it leads the soul toward truth, compassion, responsibility, and living action in the world.
The question therefore remains open for every generation: will awakening remain only a personal experience, or will it become a shared effort to help one another awaken and move toward truth and unity?
This question leads naturally to the next reflection: Time for Awakening Each Other.
Source note. Quotations and sayings attributed to the Buddha in this chapter are drawn from traditional Buddhist literature, including texts preserved in the Tipitaka (Pali Canon), such as the Maha-parinibbana Sutta, as well as later collections like the Dhammapada and widely transmitted teachings recorded by early Buddhist communities. The reflections presented here examine these traditions through the perspective of conscience, reason, and moral responsibility.
Related Reflections
FAQ — Enlightenment or Escape? Rethinking the Teaching of the Buddha
Siddhartha Gautama (563–483 BC), known as the Buddha, is regarded in Buddhist tradition as one who attained enlightenment and discovered profound insight into the nature of suffering and liberation. In a broader spiritual sense, the term “Buddha” can refer to a person who reaches a level of awakening where deeper truths about life become visible.
The Middle Path is a central teaching associated with the Buddha. It rejects both extreme indulgence in pleasure and extreme ascetic self-denial. Instead, it proposes a balanced path of discipline, reflection, and wisdom as the way to spiritual insight.
Nirvana is often described in Buddhism as liberation from Samsara, the cycle of rebirth. It represents the end of suffering and the completion of the spiritual path. Different traditions interpret Nirvana either as transcendence beyond the world or as a state of awakened understanding within it.
Buddhism emerged in an intellectual and spiritual environment shaped by Hindu traditions. Both share ideas about rebirth, spiritual discipline, and liberation, but they differ in how they understand the self, the nature of ultimate reality, and the path to enlightenment.
In many Buddhist traditions, a Bodhisattva is a being who seeks enlightenment not only for personal liberation but also for the benefit of all living beings. The Bodhisattva ideal emphasizes compassion, responsibility, and the commitment to help others reach spiritual awakening.
Choose Another Chapter:
Part One
Part Two